Month: December 2009

  • Arab lies about the Israeli/Arab conflict

    All you ever hear is Israel kicked out Arabs and caused the refugee problem, that the land has always belongs to the Muslims, and a large assortment of propaganda from Arab papers and other media that would make Joseph Goebbels, Minister of Propaganda for Nazi Germany proud since he said:

    “If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.”

     

     

    Below rufutes all the unrefined bovine plant food that the world seems to accept since it is said over and over.

    #1 The root of Arab hostility is not Israel, but rather anti-Jewish feeling for hundreds of years, past & present "peace" efforts that don't recognize this are doomed to failure.

    #2 Mecca was probably founded by Jews, and Mohomed's hatred of Jews was partly based on financing his endevors by plundering Jewish  wealth, just as Henry VIII & the Protestants plundered Catholic monastaries in
    the 1600s to fund English operations.

    #3 "Palestine" never existed as a country, language or people

    #4 There were really very few Arabs in "Palestine" before the 1890s (less than 600,000 in Israel and Jordan for several hundred years). Jews did not displace Arab farmers.

    #5 Arabs settlers flooded in *after* the Jews came in a ratio sometimes approaching 10 Arabs to 1 Jew. The massive Arab settlers caused the British to say that Palestine was "full", and in a sense displaced potential
    Jewish refugees from Europe.

    #6 The British were in violation of their mandate when they created Jordan, and the Mandate Commission, the U.S. and several others vigorously opposed this at the time. Four out of the seven overseers on the Mandate Commission were going to vote to reject the British "White Papers" but then WWII broke out.

    #7 The British ignored Arab immigration and purposely assisted Arab to come into what would be Israel. They actually told the French to *stop* policing the Syrian-Lebanon border. The British foiled all efforts to enforce border control with Jordan.

    #8 In spite of a vigorous British campaign to stop Jewish immigration into Palestine "because there was no room for more Jews", the British brought in thousands of Arab workers who settled in Palestine.

    #9 The British carried out a campaign of Arab appeasment in violation of the Mandate, even firing on Jewish immigrant boats, before -during -and even after the holocaust.

    #10 When war broke out in 1948, about 600,000 Arabs left Israel because they had only been there for a couple of years.

    #11 The Arab states, especially the Mufti (Arafat's uncle) worked close with the Nazi's. The Mufti set up office in Berlin.

    #12 The U.N. Changed their definition of a "refugee" for Palestinians to include anyone who had lived in Israel for *two years*

    #13 After the war in 1948 about 600,000 Jewish refugees left Arab countries for Israel after being persecuted there.

    And leaves the point that the Arabs, and especially the British (by dividing Palestine twice, and imposing strict quotas) were largely to blame for not providing an escape for Jews of the holocaust.

    Quotes from Arab papers:

     ON APRIL 23, 1948 Jamal Husseini, acting chairman of the Palestine Arab Higher Committee (AHC), told the UN Security Council: "The Arabs did not want to submit to a truce ... They preferred to abandon their homes,,belongings and everything they possessed."

    ON SEPTEMBER 6, 1948, the Beirut Daily Telegraph quoted Emil Ghory, secretary of the AHC, as saying: "The fact that there are those refugees is the direct consequence of the action of the Arab states in opposing partition and the Jewish state. The Arab states agreed upon this policy unanimously..."

    ON JUNE 8, 1951, Habib Issa, secretary-general of the Arab League, wrote in the New York Lebanese daily al-Hoda that in 1948, Azzam Pasha, then League secretary, had "assured the Arab peoples that the occupation of Palestine and of Tel Aviv would be as simple as  a military promenade ... Brotherly advice was given to the Arabs of  Palestine to leave their land, homes and property, and to stay temporarily in neighbouring fraternal states."

    IN THE MARCH 1976 issue of Falastin a-Thaura, then the official journal ofthe Beirut-based PLO, Mahmud Abbas ("Abu Mazen"), PLO spokesman, wrote: "The Arab armies entered Palestine to protect the
    Palestinians from the Zionist tyranny but, instead, they abandoned  them, forced them to emigrate and to leave their homeland, and threw them into prisons similar to the ghettos in which the Jews used to live."

    ON APRIL 9, 1953, the Jordanian daily al-Urdun quoted a refugee,Yunes Ahmed Assad, formerly of Deir Yassin, as saying: "For the flight  and fall of the other villages, it is our leaders who are responsible,
    because of the dissemination of rumours exaggerating Jewish crimes and  describing them as atrocities in order to inflame the Arabs ... they instilled fear and terror into the hearts of the Arabs of Palestine until they fled, leaving their homes and property to the enemy."

    ANOTHER refugee told the Jordanian daily a-Difaa on September 6, 1954: "The Arab governments told us, 'Get out so that we can get in.' So we got out, but they did not get in."

    THE JORDANIAN daily Falastin wrote on February 19, 1949: "The Arab states... encouraged the Palestinian Arabs to leave their homes  temporarily in order to be out of the way of the Arab invasion armies."

    ON OCTOBER 2, 1948, the London Economist reported, in an eyewitness  account of the flight of Haifa's Arabs: "There is little doubt that  the most potent of the factors [in the flight] were the announcements
    made over the air by the Arab Higher Executive urging all Arabs in  Haifa to quit ... And it was clearly intimated that those Arabs who remained in Haifa and accepted Jewish protection would be regarded as renegades."

    THE PRIME Minister of Syria in 1948, Khaled al-Azem, in his memoirs, published in 1973, listed what he thought were the reasons for the  Arab failure in 1948: "... the fifth factor was the call by the Arab
    governments to the inhabitants of Palestine to evacuate it and leave for the bordering Arab countries ... We brought destruction upon a million Arab refugees bycalling on them and pleading with them to leave their land."

    "FOLLOWING a visit to refugees in Gaza, a British diplomat reported the following: 'But while they express no bitterness against  the Jews...they speak with the utmost bitterness of theEgyptians and other Arab states: 'We know who our enemies are,' they will say, and they are referring to their Arab brothers who, they declare, persuaded them unnecessarily to leave their homes."
    -
    British Foreign Office Document #371/75342/XC/A/4991
    [From "Revising or Devising Israel's History" by Prof. Shlomo
    Slonim in Jewish Action, Summer 5760/2000, Vol. 60 #4]

    Jerusalem as the third most Holy site in Islam?Jerusalem's role as "The Third Holiest Site in Islam" in mainstream Islamic writings does not precede the 1930s. It was created by the Grand Mufti Haj Amin al Husseini , Hitler's Mufti. The land was in Turkish (Muslim) hands, yet take a good look at the pictures of their so called Holy site.
    The Islamic claim to the Temple is very recent, since 1930

    The land of Israel
    Sura5:19-22 :
    People of the Book!
    "Bear in mind the words of Moses to his people.He said,"Remember,my people,the favour which G-d has bestowed upon you.He raised up prophets from among you,made you kings, and given to you that which He has given no other nation.Enter,my people,the holy land which G-d has assigned for you

    Sura 10:93
    We settled the Israelites in a blessed land and provided them with good things.

    Sura17:103
    Then We said to the Israelites,"Dwell in this land.When the promise of the hearafter comes to be fulfilled,We shall assemble you all together."
     
    Thames Goldman (20 november 2000)

    Muslim critics of Israel often say that Jerusalem's holy sites must be
    transferred to Muslim control, because of the central role they play in
    Islamic theology. For instance, the Dome of the Rock was built on the site
    where Mohammed is believed to have ascended to Heaven to receive the
    revelation of the Qur'an.

    However, these people seldom actually quote the Qur'an itself. This is
    probably because, amazing as it sounds, the Qur'an actually supports the
    Zionist cause.

    Specifically, Mohammed in Sura 5:21 quotes Moses telling the Jews to "enter
    into the holy land which Allah has assigned to you". While Mohammed later
    criticizes the Jews for their sins and their refusal to accept Mohammed's
    message, he never says that, as punishment, Allah has revoked their title to
    the land. Hence the title still stands, and Muslim anti-Zionists are
    apostates.

    Indeed, this is the opinion of Sheikh Prof. Abdul Hadi Palazzi, co-chairman
    of the Islam-Israel Fellowship, who condemns the Palestinian uprising as
    "fitnah" (sedition), which is forbidden in Islam as long as the Muslims are
    granted religious freedom.

    A case could even be made that Israel's victory over the Arabs in the 1948
    war was a judgement by Allah against the Arabs for their apostasy in opposing
    the Zionists.

    This would be their just reward for transgressing Sura 2:190, which says,
    "Fight in the way of Allah against those who fight against you, but begin not
    hostilities."

    Moreover, Sura 60:9 forbids aiding the enemies of the Muslim people. Contrast
    this with the Palestinians' continued support of Saddam Hussein, whose hands
    are red with the blood of Iranian, Kurdish, and Kuwaiti Muslims.

    The Jews' return from 19 centuries of exile is actually the fulfillment of
    Islamic prophecy. Sura 17:104 says that "when the promise of the Hereafter
    comes to pass, We [Allah] shall bring you as a crowd gathered out of various
    nations".

    Sura 17:4 says, "And We [Allah] gave (clear) warning to the children of
    Israel in the Book, that twice would they do mischief on the earth and be
    elated with mighty arrogance (and twice would they be punished)!" The
    succeeding verses tell us that the punishment referred to was banishment from
    the land. But "twice" means twice, not three times; hence the Jews, having
    been banished from the land once by the Babylonians and a second time by
    Rome, will never again be banished from the land. According to the Qur'an,
    Israel is an eternal nation.

    Moreover, "twice would they do mischief on the earth" means twice, not three
    times; hence the Jews will never again do mischief on the earth. In
    particular, the Jews cannot bear moral responsibility for the Palestinian
    refugee problem.

    Sura 83:1 says, "Woe to those that deal in fraud"; yet Yasir Arafat reneged
    on his promise to guard Joseph's Tomb in Nablus after the Israeli troops
    withdrew.

    The Palestinians deny that there ever was a Jewish Temple in Jerusalem. But
    Sura 17:7 records the destruction of the First Temple by Babylon and the
    Second Temple by Rome, and Mohammed never contests the Bible's claim that the
    Temples were in Jerusalem.

    Sura 16:126 says, "If ye punish, then punish with the like of that wherewith
    ye were afflicted." Yet Ariel Sharon's nonviolent, if provocative, visit to
    the Temple Mount was met with rioting, including the use of firebombs and
    AK-47's.

    The Palestinians are hypocrites. "Allah akhbar!", they chant; "G-d is great!"
    Yet they flagrantly transgress their own cherished Scriptures. Is it any
    wonder that they have allied themselves over the years with such villains as
    Adolf Hitler, Yosef Stalin, and Saddam Hussein?
     
    Fallacies of Islam
       As you will see from the following quotes, the Quran does have the effect, if not
    the design, of promoting disparagement of Jews and Christians. The quotes are from the English version of the Quran and although some content may have been lost in translation, the main ideas of the verses are clear. Upon reading these verses, three things should become clear. That The Quran shows clear animosity toward Jews and Christians.
    That the verses are written in an argumentative style that is more typical of a person than of God. That the overall style and certain references do not conform to the biblical text that (supposedly) contain the roots of Islam. See (Sura 5:44). Surly these issues are subjective, however we must consider what the majority of people would consider reasonable.
       82:62 Those who believe (in the Qur'an), and those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Christians and the Sabians,- any who believe in Allah and the Last Day, and work righteousness, shall have their reward with their Lord; on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve.
       
        This is nice sentiment, however it will be repeatedly contradicted in later text. Shortly after this was written Muhammad's army slaughtered hundreds of Jews and sold their women and children into slavery.
       2:111 And they say: "None shall enter Paradise unless he be a Jew or a Christian."
    Those are their (vain) desires. Say: "Produce your proof if ye are truthful."
       
        Who said that and where is it written? If this refers to a quote from Torah it is God's words and not that of the Jewish people.The language and communication style used in this verse as in all of these verses, is noticibly different from that in both the Torah and in the New Testament. At any rate the verse has a malicious tone thatdisparages other religions. The fact is that Judaism says no such thing in the Torah or otherwise. The talmud states Tosefta,Saheddrin 13:The righteous of all nations have a share in the World to Come and the Zohar (Kabbalistic writings) says Tana DeBei Eliahu Rabbah 9: I call heaven and earth as witnesses:Any individual,whether gentile or Jew,man or woman,servant or maid,can bring the Divine Presence upon himself in accordance to his deeds.

     2:113 The Jews say: "The Christians have naught (to stand) upon; and the Christians say: "The Jews have naught (To stand) upon." Yet they (Profess to) study the(same) Book. Like unto their word is what those say who know not; but Allah will judge between them in their quarrel on the Day of Judgment.
       
       Again the communication style differs from that which we are used to, and again we see language that appears to be intended to discredit Jews and Christians. The main issue here is that Jews and Christians do not in fact profess to study the same book. Certainly God would know this, Muhammad on the other hand, evidently did not. This discrepancy suggests that it was in fact Muhammad that wrote the Quran.

       2:120 Never will the Jews or the Christians be satisfied with thee unless thou follow their form of religion. Say: "The Guidance of Allah,-that is the (only) Guidance." Wert thou to follow their desires after the knowledge which hath reached thee, then wouldst thou find neither Protector nor helper against Allah.
       
       Consider the point of view of the author, although written in the third person it seems as though the author is obsessed with deliberation with the Jewish and Christian people. This verse seems to reflect emotions that are more typical of a man than of God.
       
    2:135 They say: "Become Jews or Christians if ye would be guided (To
    salvation)." Say thou: "Nay! (I would rather) the Religion of Abraham the True, and he
    joined not gods with Allah."
       
       Who says this? Certainly, if this text was written by God He would remember that Judaism doesn't teach someone needs to become Jewish to merit the World to Come.
     
       2:140 Or do ye say that Abraham, Isma'il, Isaac, Jacob and the Tribes were Jews or Christians? Say: Do ye know better than Allah. Ah! who is more unjust than those who conceal the testimony they have from Allah. but Allah is not unmindful of what ye do!
       
    This verse like those before it is written in an argumentative style that would be unlikely of God. It also contains the direct accusation that Jews and Christians are unjust. 

      
          4:46 Of the Jews there are those who displace words from their (right) places, and say: "We hear and we disobey"; and "Hear what is not Heard"; and "Ra'ina"; with a twist of their tongues and a slander to Faith. If only they had said: "What hear and we obey"; and "Do hear"; and "Do look at us"; it would have been better for them, and more proper; but Allah hath cursed them for their Unbelief; and but few of them will believe.

       The debasement of the Jews continues in this verse with a supposed statement by God that he has cursed the entire religion. Is this not in direct conflict with verse 82:62?

       4:160 For the iniquity of the Jews We made unlawful for them certain (foods) good and wholesome which had been lawful for them;- in that they hindered many from Allah's Way;

       I assume this verse refers to the Kosher restrictions. If this is the case, the author clearly does not understand the nature of the Kosher restrictions. A good question that comes to mind is, why would God punish the Jews with restrictions if the Jews typically disobey such commandments? ("We hear and we disobey ,4:46).
       
    2:120 Never will the Jews or the Christians be satisfied with thee unless thou follow their form of religion. Say: "The Guidance of Allah,-that is the (only) Guidance." Wert thou to follow their desires after the knowledge which hath reached thee, then wouldst thou find neither Protector nor helper against Allah.
       
    5:18 (Both) the Jews and the Christians say: "We are sons of Allah, and his beloved." Say: "Why then doth He punish you for your sins? Nay, ye are but men,- of the men he hath created: He forgiveth whom He pleaseth, and He punisheth whom He pleaseth: and to Allah belongeth the dominion of the heavens and the earth, and all that is between: and unto Him is the final goal (of all)"
       
       Here the point made by the author possesses no obvious flaws. What is apparent here as in most of the verses, is the anti-Jew, anti-Christian theme. The style also suggests that the sentiments are the words of a personally involved party and not of the King of Kings.
       
    5:41 O Messenger. let not those grieve thee, who race each other into unbelief: (whether it be) among those who say "We believe" with their lips but whose hearts have no faith; or it be among the Jews,- men who will listen to any lie,- will listen even to others who have never so much as come to thee. They change the words from their (right) times and places: they say, "If ye are given this, take it, but if not, beware!" If any one's trial is intended by Allah, thou hast no authority in the least for him against Allah. For such - it is not Allah.s will to purify their hearts. For them there is disgrace in this world, and in the Hereafter a heavy punishment.

       Here we see another clear attempt to slander the Jewish people. Had this been an article published in a newspaper it would surly be condemned as an anti-Semitic assault. If we expect more than this from men, how much more could we expect from God.
           
    5:44 It was We who revealed the law (to Moses): therein was guidance and light. By its standard have been judged the Jews, by the prophets who bowed (as in Islam) to Allah.s will, by the rabbis and the doctors of law: for to them was entrusted the protection of Allah.s book, and they were witnesses thereto: therefore fear not men, but fear me, and sell not my signs for a miserable price. If any do fail to judge by (the light of) what Allah hath revealed, they are (no better than) Unbelievers.

       The Quran was written around 6oo AD, yet in this verse we see the attempt by Islam to make the retroactive claim that Jewish history was in fact Islamic history incognito. I assume the Muslims have an elaborate explanation as to why it took thousands of years to get things straightened out. It is important to note however, that Muhammad's people stood to gain a great deal from such a claim. There is also a sub claim here, Islam refers to Torah as "Gods book," this suggests that Torah is in fact a bench mark for discussion of Islam. Therefore, it would be an inconsistency to refute its teachings. This is done in Quran both directly and accidentally. (2:111 And they say: "None shall enter Paradise unless he be a Jew or a Christian." Those are their (vain)desires. Say: "Produce your proof if ye are truthful." ).
       
    In verse 5:44 the author shifts from criticism of Jews to pro active Judgment of
    the Jews (by Muslims),( If any do fail to judge by (the light of) what Allah hath revealed, they are (no better than) Unbelievers.).


       5:51 O ye who believe! take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and
    protectors: They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guideth not a people unjust.
       
       I probably don't need to point out the defamation of the Jewish and Christian people in verse 5:51, and it should be clear to the plainest of logic that this verse was written by a man with a great deal of animosity toward these people.
       
    5:64 The Jews say: "(Allah)'s hand is tied up." Be their hands tied up and be they accursed for the (blasphemy) they utter. Nay, both His hands are widely outstretched: He giveth and spendeth (of His bounty) as He pleaseth. But the revelation that cometh to thee from Allah increaseth in most of them their obstinate rebellion and blasphemy. Amongst them we have placed enmity and hatred till the Day of Judgment. Every time they kindle the fire of war, Allah doth extinguish it; but they (ever) strive to do mischief on earth. And Allah loveth not those who do mischief.
       
    Here the vilification of the Jews grows more intense with the assertion that God's chosen people are now hated by God. Once again the author reveals his personal involvement with his hostility toward the Jews for rejecting the Quran. One thing that is important to note here is that when Torah speaks of people falling out of grace with God it is referring to small, limited groups of people such as those in Sodom and Gomorrah. Those people were dispatched, and the story ended leaving only history. In contrast, the Quran's affront of Jews and Christians has the very different effect of ongoing malice toward a living race of people. This is unacceptable by today's standards, and is simply not the way of God.
       
    But the revelation that cometh to thee from Allah increaseth in most of them their
    obstinate rebellion and blasphemy.
      
     This statement was supposedly written before the Jews had knowledge of it, how then could they have rejected it? This is like saying, "I would have sent cash but I already sealed the envelope". Perhaps God was foretelling the future, like when he said he would harden Pharaohs heart? If that is the case, one must ask why God had confidence in the Jewish people for so long only to pre-condemn them this time?
       
    5:69 Those who believe (in the Qur'an), those who follow the Jewish (scriptures),
    and the Sabians and the Christians,- any who believe in Allah and the Last Day, and work righteousness,- on them shall be no fear, nor shall they grieve.
       
    How can any reasonable person expect that this would be possible given the
    damaging statements made in other verses?

       5:82 Strongest among men in enmity to the believers wilt thou find the Jews and
    Pagans; and nearest among them in love to the believers wilt thou find those who say, "We are Christians": because amongst these are men devoted to learning and men who have renounced the world, and they are not arrogant.
       
    It appears as though the author has changed his mind about the Christians for the time being.

       6:146 For those who followed the Jewish Law, We forbade every (animal) with
    undivided hoof, and We forbade them that fat of the ox and the sheep, except what
    adheres to their backs or their entrails, or is mixed up with a bone: this in recompense for their wilful disobedience: for We are true (in Our ordinances).
       
    This is an obvious misunderstanding of the Kosher restrictions. It is not likely that God would make such a grievous error. Perhaps the use of the term we ( first person) refers to Muslims, of which the author is one. If this is the case than it would seem to imply that the Quran is expressing the views of Muhammad, and not of God. Some may argue that the term "we" was used because God is a Muslim. This idea would not make sense given that the term "Muslim" means "one who submits to God". Similarly it would imply that the Muslims are God's peers. This would go against the most fundamental tenants of Islam.

       9:30 The Jews call 'Uzair a son of Allah, and the Christians call Christ the son of Allah. That is a saying from their mouth; (in this) they but imitate what the unbelievers of old used to say. Allah's curse be on them: how they are deluded away from the Truth!
      
     The author of this verse clearly has no knowledge of Judaism. I say this because, as every Jew knows the idea that God would have a son beyond the figuative or poety stles shown in the Torah,Psalms and other writings is an absurdity to Judaism.

       16:118 To the Jews We prohibited such things as We have mentioned to thee before: We did them no wrong, but they were used to doing wrong to themselves.
       
    I assume the repeated use of the word "we" is a slip by Muhammad . At any rate the simplicity of the logic here speaks for itself.
       
    22:17 Those who believe (in the Qur'an), those who follow the Jewish (scriptures), and the Sabians, Christians, Magians, and Polytheists,- Allah will judge between them on the Day of Judgment: for Allah is witness of all things. 
       
    The use of the phrase "judge between them" reinforces my assertion that these verses are written in an argumentative format more typical of a human author than of God.
       
    These issues are subject to each persons individual interpretation of what is likely and what is reasonable. What is clear, is that the Quran does contain defamatory remarks toward Jews and Christians, and that the writing style of the Quran differs from both the Old and New Testament. Also clear is that the style of these verses is argumentative and seem to focus on a dispute between men. Of particular significance, is the fact that historical accounts of the time period suggest that Muhammad did in fact, have political reasons that parallel the opinions expressed in the Quran. Does this seem to be an incredible coincidence? Another issue, is the abundance of staked evidence. Of the twenty quotes found regarding Judaism, only two spoke well of other religions and they did so in a precursory manner. As mentioned previously each person must draw his or her own conclusions. As for myself, I am reasonably certain that God would not speak that way of His chosen people.

  • Pretty Damn Crude (Oil)

     

    Look at the cost of crude per barrel. The average cost now in 2009 is $36 a barrel and gas is over $2.50 a gal. The cost of crude a barrel in '83 was $34 and gas was under a  buck a gal. Government sanctioned price gouging of the American people?
    http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/txt/ptb1107.html
     
    This site shows crude price averages from 1970-2009 and notice it is a GOV site, not some paranoid conspiracy theory site. Compare the crude price and then think what you paid per gal for gas at the time.
     
    Remember that when crude hit the record at $147, the oil companies were posting the HIGHEST earnings per quarter in the history of their existence yet day after day claimed the high prices for gas was because of what they had to pay for crude.Do they really think that the American people are so blind as to believe they charged themselves $147 per barrel for oil from their own wells in the US?
     
    It is estimated that over 800 billion dollars will leave US shores to oil producing countries by the end of 2009 and our own oil companies,with the ok of the feds, is making it happen so they get their share.
     
    Electric cars? Hydrogen fuel cells? Renewable methane powered cars? Yeah, they have the tech to make them, they even show them off at shows,but you won't see them except as a rich person's toy (check the price on some of the electric models).
     
    As long as the US government is controlled by the oil lobby, the price gouging of the oil companies and allow the arab oil garrot to tighten around the throat of America,We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence,will remain owned to maintain a profit margin for big oil and foreign interests.
    NoBS
     
     
     

  • What does Christmas mean to you?

    Not a damn thing

       

    I just answered this Featured Question; you can answer it too!

  • If you were granted 3 wishes from a genie what would you wish for?

    1. A Harley junkyard with 4000 basket case bikes to harvest parts from.

    2. A decent 4 bedroom house with a garage next to the place

    3.A decent offshore fishing boat

       

    I just answered this Featured Question; you can answer it too!

  • Dinos on Noah's Ark? WTH !?

    Scoping out a website and this guy's statement that no dinos were on Noah's ark because they were genetic abominations created by fallen angels really blew me away.I keep looking , but so far no luck on a chapter and verse for this moronic claim. Yep, he said dinos were walking around still when Noah built the boat. It must have been a real bummer having your crops, livestock and the occational farmhand eaten prior to the flood. I bet you think it's a pain when a dog uses your front lawn, so imagine the pooper scooper you'd have needed back then?

     

    Oh Crap

  • Going Paperless My Ass

    Well, the day has officially started with getting up,walking the worthless dog and getting the standard replacement of ," I need breakfast.", in lieu of good morning from the kid .Settling down to scope out my emails,low and behold, another of the "Go paperless" messages from the many institutions whose little plastic cards of financial death I store for them in my wallet.

    While I support trying to keep the mud ball we live on at least somewhat clean and even go through the city mandated weekly ritual of separating my recyclables so they can come and dump them willy nilly into the back of a regular garbage truck, I REFUSE to go paperless with the credit card companies.

    Why is this,you may ask? After most of them getting bailed out by my taxes to cover their inate greed at the top of the corporate food chain's paycheck bonanza and the inept practices of sending out a billion, "You've been Pre-approved" cards to anyone and everyone, they decided to get even more by kicking up the interest rates on the working slobs of this country that now pay for the deadbeats that got the cards ,maxed them out, and tossed them in the trash.Nothing like getting  "rewarded"  for paying your damn bill on time by having your card rate go from twelve percent to twenty.You call to find out why and get told,"It's because you have a revolving balance." Know what that means? It means you don't pay your card off a hundred percent every month. If I wanted to put out the cash every month for what I buy,WTF do I need with a credit card? Just pay cash or use my damn debit card.

     Stop getting paper statements so their profit margins can go even higher by cutting their expense to send them out, while they put a stranglehold on my wallet and keep up doing the same crap they did to sink the economy to pay for their screw ups?!?

    Pffffttt ! Bite me.